surFACE

I can empathise with your pain Frida!  As an artist, the pain of repeated rejection is profoundly disheartening, yet it does not diminish my passion for painting, nor will I let it break my spirit. My love for art remains unwavering; to abandon this creative pursuit would be akin to the death of my soul. I was proud to submit my work to one of Australia’s most prestigious art competitions, the Sulman Prize. We artists continually harbor the hope of winning recognition for our lifelong dedication to both a personal and public cause. Such acknowledgment signifies our readiness and the worthiness of our art to be displayed and judged by both aficionados and the public.

However, when I learned the identity of this year’s Sulman Prize judge, my optimism waned. Familiarity with his work led me to believe my chances were slim, and indeed, I was not selected as a finalist. While this outcome was expected, I remain undeterred, as winning requires being part of the competition. I had heard that Art Prizes are a bit like a lottery, therefore participation is essential! Curiously, a simple post-it note with a shopping list was chosen as one of 40 finalists, a decision I cannot comprehend. I wish there were a Salon des Refusés for the Sulman Prize (as the Archibald has) where the true masterpieces, crafted with dedication and meticulous refinement, could be appreciated. To quote Salvador Dalí. “Have no fear of perfection, you’ll never reach it!” This sentiment resonates with us (artists), as we strive for more than just submitting a shopping list on a post-it note.

Recently, I had the privilege of viewing Frida Kahlo’s paintings up close at an exhibition at the Art Gallery of South Australia. The exhibition, focusing on Mexican contemporary artists prominently featured Frida Kahlo and Diego Rivera. Having studied Frida extensively through various biographies, I understood her deep self-expression through her art. However, seeing her brush strokes in person provided an entirely new perspective. Frida’s use of tiny brushes, typically associated with hyperrealism, achieved the naive style she is renowned for, and this was particularly striking. Her extensive body of work, over 200 pieces, is remarkable, especially considering her physical limitations. It is evident she spent most of her days seated (sometimes strapped to the chair) at her easel, reflecting on her imperfect physicality through her art. Every raw emotion she experienced was channelled onto the canvas, making her art a vessel for understanding her immense physical and emotional pain.

Frida’s approach in life, having faced death directly, was filled with an unmatched fervour to live fully and experience every moment? Her choice to wear flamboyant Tijuana skirts to disguise her polio-stricken leg and the brace that supported her body was a testament to her ingenuity by defying the conventional fashion of the times (1920’, 30’s). Externally, she was a stunning figure, determined by her bold fashion statements. Internally, her body was frail, but her spirit was indomitable. As a modern woman ahead of her time, Frida was bisexual, promiscuous, audacious, and resilient. She embraced her vulnerability while living in the shadow of her husband, Diego Rivera. All these aspects of her life she laid bare on the canvas, exposing her personal struggle through her art, and this is what gained her recognition as one of our greatest Surrealism painters of that era.

After her passing, Frida Kahlo became a phenomenon, a modern martyr born from her tragic existence and enduring suffering. Frida was physically broken by a trolley car accident at the age of 19, which left her maimed for life. She endured 32 spinal operations and ultimately faced the amputation of her leg below the knee due to complications from polio contracted in childhood. This final blow (at age 46) broke her spirit; despite maintaining an optimistic outlook for most of her life, she fell into a deep depression. It is suspected that she chose to end her own life. Her poignant final words, “I hope the exit is joyful and I hope never to return,” suggest she had reached the limits of her endurance.

My deep fascination and research of Frida promoted me to invite her into my studio, through a portrait (of her). I was inspired by a photograph taken by her lover, Nikolas Murray, in which she looked stunning, as she often did in his staged studio photographs. She appeared very Mona Lisa-like, with a slight smirk and elegantly folded hands. This made me wonder if it was possible to capture the spirit of the deceased, to commune with her in some way through the act of a dedicated painting. And so, I promised Frida my best efforts and asked her if she would accompany me with the process – to become my muse.

Everything proceeded smoothly until I reached her face. X-ray images of this painting will reveal at least five different renditions of Frida’s face beneath the final layer. The journey to creating this painting, representing a mended Frida, stemmed from what I initially perceived as a massive failure. Or perhaps, it was not! Frustrated and convinced that painting from a photograph was too difficult due to its lack of dimension, the idea of Kintsugi struck me. The concept of reconstructing Frida Kahlo through the Japanese art of Kintsugi came to me like a lightning bolt, even though it was a gradual and often frustrating process to arrive at that point—an experience that underscores why I love art. This method of embracing flaws and imperfections seemed the perfect approach to honour Frida’s brokenness.


In a bold move, I blacked out her entire face to start anew. To create distinct sections of her best paintings, I applied gold leaf cracks. This process involves using glue to adhere the gold leaf to the dedicated line, then brushing off the excess. As I brushed, the gold broke apart like gold dust, scattering across the entire painting. In that moment, I was struck by the poignant coincidence of Frida’s trolley accident, where she was found impaled on a pole, bloodied, and covered in gold dust—the spilled remains of another passenger’s gold paint pigment.

Recognizing the profound connection between my creative process and her life story I smirked with acknowledgment. Perhaps she was trying to teach me – to find my own voice, in recognition that portraits aren’t my thing – but masks are.

What is Marriage anyway?

Is it a covenant, or a romantic notion? With divorce at an all time record high in history, why do we bother any more to ‘seal the deal’ and ‘tie the knot’. The latter quite possibly sums up what marriage does to relationship, puts a great big knot in it!

Does marriage breed complacency through the safety of knowing the ring is on, ownership aquired, he/she is MINE! Is this the beginning of the end? Should two people choose to commit to the covenant of marriage (inevitably a bloody long time) or simply reside under the same roof? Would couples be better off just living together until the novelty wears off, the lust dies down, and whatever is left over analysed for compatibility to endure a future together? Isn’t this what happens anyway?

Well this I do know, there is no recipe for a lasting marriage because the mix is always different. No marriage between two people could ever be compared to another for that very reason; the cocktail is always a very different concoction. From Bloody Mary’s, Harvey Wall Bangers and Screwdrivers, to Tom & Jerry’s, Orgasms, Sweet Dreams and Hanky Pankys. Life together is the elixer.

William Blake, the nineteenth century artist and poet during the Romantic period, wrote that “marriage was a form of unpaid prostitution and slavery”. I am sure that he was referring to his own wife in both contexts owing to her household and nuptial duties, however these days I am sure that the male in a marriage could indeed be the slave; to his job, and the financial toll of marriage, not to mention renovating and maintaining the home.

But there are rewards for the effort as well, for marriage is an institution. But I use the term endearingly in that it is usually for the creation of something larger than the individual; the sum of two parts being greater than one.  It is a safety net for the clan, of building a home and life in which we instil values for children, share wonderful life events and create memories. When we enter a marriage we trust that our partner will honour the convenant. We trust that they will respect the bond of love which brought them together which in turn offers a natural and lasting fidelity along with home and financial security.

Marriage is also a commitment to establishing a network of friends, like minded individuals you can connect with to enhance your social life and create more wonderful memories. If you don’t have friends in your life together, and common interests, then the marriage runs the risk of becoming a vacuous black hole, which inevitably sucks the life out of each of you because of too much pressure to perform in all aspects of life (and relationship).

Whist marriage is the institution,  relationship is the foundation, and if this is not right, then the marriage is doomed to crumble.

For me, marriage is TRUST, implicitly, and without it there is nothing!

T: Truth R: Respect U: Universality  S: Security T: Tenacity

Having been around the block twice now (in the marriage stakes), I have come to the conclusion that I am a 10 year serial monogamist. I also think that this is a pretty good innings in today’s climate of exponential longevity. Both of my marriages were so different, almost to the point of being seasonal. For a reason and only a season. The first was to bear and raise children, and I chose a good man who was a good provider. Wise women will do that. The second marriage was to learn how to be on my own. I chose a good man once again, but he wanted to own me and become his chattel, much as William Blake had described. I eventually worked out the mistake / lesson, and made my own way, once again.

I have recently listened to Jane Fonda espouse the fact that it was not until she was 65 that she worked out how to be on her own – without a man. She left a perfectly good marriage as she describes it, so that she could just be her own person. In this day and age of so much choice, there is a growing movement towards ‘singledom’, which I feel describes where I am. But, and it is a big BUT, I still crave the idea of having a partner, not necessary a marriage, but a companion in life. And I feel that this is just a part of simply being human.

Curious about when ‘Marriage’ was invented, I came across this statement from my research: Most ancient societies needed a secure environment for the perpetuation of the species, a system of rules to handle the granting of property rights, and the protection of bloodlines, and the institution of marriage handled these needs. The earliest recorded marriage records go back to 2350 BC in ancient Mesopotamia.

I still respect the institution of marriage, for all the benefits it provides the family unit, which was precisely why it was invented. But it is not necessarily relevant for many people living individual lives.

As the author of this work I (Barbara Harkness) acknowledge the moral rights to the above have been asserted with the copyright, designs and patents act 1988. If you wish to use any of my material you may contact me for permission.